Marc Platt's Politics: I'm a Lefty
Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek.
(Barack H. Obama)
WHat is going on at the White House? They are letting the narrative get away because of their own disdain for the process. What process do you ask? The process of the opposing party and the OTHER opposing party known as the political press.
Let's start with the AP story. The Department of Justice admitted to gathering info on AP writers and collecting phone numbers and other info. The press IS REALLY the 4th branch of government and they don't take kindly to getting their fellow reporters bugged and phone tapped. It doesn't matter that lives are at risk and there may be an actual threat. The Bush administration spied on us all the time and the congress did next to nothing. Obama IS responsible for the DOJ in the end and he must take action. Eric Holder has is ass in the grinder right now, but is far too crafty to get caught in any inappropriate activities. Holder will once again be able to get by the Republican landmines that have been there since he became the first African American Attorney General.
The IRS targeted the NAACP in 2004 and Democrats barely raised an eyebrow in congress. The press made it a sidenote in its reporting. But now the Obama White House lords over an IRS that targets right-leaning organizations that are clearly political and are trying to get tax exempt status. Obama must fire people in the IRS immediately. Heads hav e to roll on this one.
Most Americans don't even realize that the IRS is properly looking for cheaters. They were doing what they are supposed to do, look for red flags and people trying to unfairly get tax exempt status. The only problem is that they didn't ALSO go after OFA, the Democrats version or any of the OTHER left-leaning organizations. That was a bad move. Mr. Shulman, who actually was the IRS executive (appointed by George W. Bush) at the time, is no longer there. The current regime is equally inept.
Benghazi. This is NOT Obama's fault. He has done everything since that terrible week last September in which Susan Rice went on the Sunday morning shows and gave bad and OLD info to the public. Benghazi will NOT be the thing that Republicans are able to "GET" Obama on. They are wasting their time with this political theater. It is tragic that the 4 dimplomats were killed, but there was no way planes could have reached the compound in a timely manner anyway. This was a CIA deal. That is what will come out in more detail in the next few months. Chris Stevens was on his own, without proper cover. That sucks and should be remedied. The compound was being used for CIA covert activities. THAT is the elephant in the room here folks.
Yes, Mr. Obama is having a bad month. He deserves some of the heat. He deserves heat for his mishandling of the narrative on the DOJ/AP story and the narrative on the IRS disaster.
My solution to his problems is the same as Ronald Reagan bringing in Baker when Iran/Contra happened and when Bill Clinton brought new blood in to help clean up the Lewisky debacle in 1997-8.
Is "Mr. Clean" from Pulp Fiction available?
Here is an idea...Obama needs to check his ego at the door and bring back either Rahm Emauel or David Axelrod to come in and restore order to a runaway White House.
“We are proud of you...You are viewed with admiration and respect”
(Sen. John McCain, R- Ariz. to Hillary Clinton during her Benghazi Testimony January, 2013)
Benghazi is and was a mess. Why were we even there without adequate protection for our diplomats? The answer is becoming apparent that there were a lot of CIA operatives at the compound and NOT a lot of diplomatic action at the time the compound was attacked.
In my opinion, the Obama administration needs to come clean about this and the sooner , the better.
I also believe that the "scandal" and "cover-up" accusations are BS. The Republicans in congress can't even tell the American people WHAT the "scandal" and "cover-up" is.
Why do you ask?
Here is what I think.
At the time of Benghazi (and the other protests) on Sepember 11, 2012, Obama was trying to get re-elected. At the time, the GOP tried to make political hay out of it. It completely backfired during that 2nd debate when Mitt Romney tried to back Obama into the the use of the word "terror" the day after the attack. We all remember Mitt with a lot of egg on his face. I don't need to go throught whole thing.
Why are the Republicans trying to take every advantage of these hearings that they keep calling for?
Hillary Rodham Clinton, our former Secretary of State.
The GOP hopefuls like Rand Paul and Marco Rubio are tweeting and going on Fox News with all these statements indicating Mrs. Clinton is unfit to serve as our 45th President because of Benghazi. The narrative has changed from Obama and Susan Rice's fault for the Sunday Morning debacle to IT IS ALL HILLARY'S FAULT.
Mr. Obama has no more elections to run and win. They all know that she will be a formidable candidate in 2016 if she even runs. With her popularity still soaring they MUST try to bring her numbers down to even have a chance.
Mrs. Clinton and former President Bill Clinton are VERY smart people. They got her out of the State Department early enough so she can have a chance if she wants to run and win.
I am of the opinion that Benghazi was tragic. So was Iraq and EVERY OTHER event since September 11, 2001 that has involved our military forces and diplomats. It is a tough racket. Obama will certainly have his ghands full with the Middle East throughout the remainder of his time in office.
Benghazi will NOT make a difference in Hillary Clinton's run in 2016, if she does run.
Astair & Rogers, Abbott & Costello, Lennon & McCartney AND Reinhart & Rogoff. What do all these pairs have in common?
Each of these twosomes contributed something in their field that was lauded and praised by the general public. Each of these teams excelled in their fields and are accepted as the top of their professions.
Most people do not have the vaguest idea who Reinhart and Rogoff are. Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff are Harvard economists who provided an economic study that argues that higher public debt slows down economic growth when the GDP rises above a 90% threshold. Reinhart and Rogoff did the work and because 99% of us have no idea how the economy actually works, their findings were pretty much taken as gospel.
Uh oh. Umass did it's own study. 28-year-old grad student Thomas Herndon and his two economics professors, Michael Ash and Robert Pollin actually took Reinhart and Rogoff's acclaimed and accepted study and ran the numbers several times and were NOT able to reproduce Reinhart and Rogoff's results. Herndon called the famous pair and asked them to provide him with their spreadsheet. Uh oh. Reinhart and Rogoff's spreadsheet had 5 missing columns. Five countries, including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, and Canada–were removed and...
The NEW numbers with the PROPER GDP Growth (example Spain was corrected from 2.8% to the CORRECT 2.2%) completely debunked the Harvard study. Why do you ask am I making such a big deal out of this debunked study?
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) has been touting the Harvard study since 2011 and making it the basis for the spending cuts and current Sequester that is slowly dragging our economy down even further. Boehner and McConnell are also guilty of using the findings of this study to govern.
The Congressional Republicans have had little good news in the past five years. They erroneously thought this Harvard study legitimized the austerity they so want to impose on American citizens, based on THEIR idealogy. This isn't what is best for everyone and the majority AND the weak, who cannot defend themselves.
This REALLY pisses me off. Paul Ryan is a jerk to not even try to do anything to help his citizens. We get bogus budgets from this guy and his bullshit committee every year. Obama can't even get his budget to congress without Ryan shitting all over it.
This is no way to govern. The GOP is making itself obsolete. I am starting to hope that Hillary Clinton DOES run in 2016. It will really be over for this 'PARTY" then. She has a lot of old scores to settle and she will.
I say keep ignoring the will and desire of the public GOP. This latest "Background Check" fiasco is just the start of the polls sinking lower and lower. Republican Senators Kelly Ayotte and Jeff Flake were politically stupid to blindly follow the NRA on this watered-down garbage bill that Manchin & Toomey tried to get passed in bi-partisan fashion. The poll numbers for a lot of the senators who voted against background checks are sinking. GOP PA Senator Pat Toomey went UP five points after co-sponsering the bill with Democrat Joe Manchin. Hey Republicans...Wake the fuck up.
There will be so much happening this spring and summer with Syria, Iran, Isreal and the U.S. Congress, it will be hard to keep track of the scorecard.
Rest assured. We will keep track and burn the GOP house down in the next two election cycles.
Much credit and love to 28-year-old Thomas Herndon and his two professors. They did themselves and their country proud on this one.
“Nobody puts Baby in a corner”
(from 'Dirty Dancing' 1987)
America gave Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev refuge, a chance to be educated, make a living and raise their own families. America got a slap in the face and spit on in return by the two Chechnyan-born young men, who may have been on their way to New York's Time Square for more mayhem.
Their mother can cry all she wants that her babies were framed. Alex Jones and the right wing media can start to spew out garbage of a conspiracy by the government, but the facts are coming out every minute that goes by that shows otherwise.
Most U.S. citizens know what is really going on. They see the facts all coming to light in all sorts of media outlets and have their own feelings on the subject.
The people can see for themselves the evidence and the damage that has been done. We can watch victims go on TV in hospital press conferences and speak plainly as to what they are going through.
Contrast the victims with the mother getting interviewed and crying that they"were framed." The evidence, including the younger suspect's own words state otherwise. I don't feel sorry for her losing her oldest terrorist son and I don't feel sorry for what will happen legally to her younger son.
I do feel sorry for the Campbells, Richards and the Chinese family of Lu Lingzi who were killed. I also feel for Sean Collier's family, the MIT Security officer killed in a shootout with the Tsarnaev brothers. The living victims, who have lost limbs, should be celebrated for their positive attitudes and courage.
The mother has been tied to some radical ideas in British newspapers. It is possible she indirectly had something to do with this herself, according to the 'Daily Mail' newspaper in England.
Who do we believe?
We believe our own common sense, once there are enough facts. We are getting close to that point. The video doesn't lie. They have the Tsarnaev brothers on tape with ther backpacks JUST before the explosions. They have an eye witness who looked suspect #2 in the eye as he placed the backpack down that exploded just a moment or so later. They have the younger Tsarnaev writing down basically a confession in his hospital bed.
It will be very difficult with American citizens to sympathize with any stated possible motives like our current and recently past wars. We are not at war with Chechnya. Whatever radical activism these two were involved with are hard to reconcile with their actions.
Nobody puts "America" in a corner. We can make up our own minds, based on the facts.
"Greatness. It comes in many forms, sometimes it comes in the form of sacrifice - that's the loneliest form."
(From "The Contender," 2000)
members of the U.S. Senate sacrificed lately? What great pain have the senators who voted against "Background Checks," which may the MOST watered down legislation brought to that chamber in years, had to experience?
The answer to that question may escalate as time goes on. American politics are changing. The very powerful lobbyists who have ruled the roost for decades are systematically being exposed by activists and LEFTWING lobbyists like Michael Bloomberg.
Why Mike Bloomberg? He will leave office as mayor of New York soon and needs something to do with his extra millions. He wants to leave his mark and HE CAN. I am sold that this guy wants to do good and he knows he is too old to run for president and America may not be ready for Mr. Bloomberg as Commander In Chief.
The parents of those murdered children in Newtown are becoming a powerful force of their own. These are upper economic folks who a year ago were raising their young families. Newtown has changed all that. They now have a higher purpose in life. These angered parents do not want the deaths of their 6-7-year-olds to be for nothing. They have come to Washington to make a difference in the fight for gun control legislation. They have found a willing partner.
They have bonded with President Obama and he listens to them and advises them on how to take on the system. Obama apparently wants to piece-by-piece, dismantle to the powerful gun lobby by using the will of the people. It is VERY ambitious, but he obviously thinks by using his bully pulpit, he can travel the land and spread the word.
This is a painful and slow process. Obama most likely knew that the "Background Check" bill was sketchy with the amount of money pouring into the few Democrats states who are "Gun-Loving." Smaller states like Montana are VERY Pro Gun Rights states and Obama actually used the word "lie" when referring to the gun lobby stating "Facts" that were skewed about the actual background checks.
It is easy to see why Obama is upset. The NRA took out ads stating that this bill would lead to a "Gun Registry." In fact the bill had it written into the text that there would be "NO GUN REGISTRY." The NRA and it's partner gun manufacturers (THE PEOPLE WHO REALLY FUND THE NRA) lied and got away with it.
I wonder how many of the senators who voted against this bill actually read the background checks bill?
Now after the Boston Marathon bombings, Iowa GOP Senator, Charles Grassley and Kentucky GOP SEnator Rand Paul are linking the two Chechnyan former nationals as a link to the current Immigration Reform legislation. Paul saying that these implanted Chechnyans are a good example why a Path to Citizenship for immigrants should be re-thought.
The Republican Party finds more ways to make them obsolete and will continue to lose national elections. They KNOW they have to include the Latino community in the equation or they will never get the votes to win the presidency. Grassley and Paul are idiots. Aside from the nearly 3,000 people we tragically lost on Nine Eleven, we have now lost a total of three more in the Boston bombing. Grassley and Paul could be spearheading a movement that will set their party back MANY MORE YEARS.
While I understand President Obama's condemnation of the senate for their lack of legislative common sense (Polls range from 80-90% support of background checks), he knows that state by state THOSE legislatures are doing gun reform themselves.
It is a slower process, but in the end WILL be the way it happens. THEN congress will act. As each state makes gun reform the law of the land, the U.S. Congress will have to catch up.
On the converse end, the Republican-Run legislatures are making abortion impossible by shutting down health clinics where abortions are performed. Until a case comes to the U.S. Supreme Court where the COURT makes this practice illegal, it will keep happening and even though Roe V Wade is the law of the land, the Red States have found a way to go around the constiution.
American politics is a mess!